“a stand” → Suzuki: “nowhere shining.” The object Huineng negates is deleted; a predicate no recension contains is added.

Platform Sūtra (Huineng’s verse) Image inversion Dictionary: 臺

The confrontation

D.T. Suzuki

The Bodhi is not like the tree, / The mirror bright is nowhere shining; / As there is nothing from the first, / Where can the dust itself collect?

Essays in Zen Buddhism, First Series, Luzac & Co. (later Rider), 1927, p. 155

The source

菩提本無樹,明鏡亦非,本來無一物,何處惹塵埃

Bodhi originally has no tree; the bright mirror too is no stand; originally, there is not a single thing: where could dust alight?

Huineng’s answering verse, Platform Sūtra (Zongbao edition) · T48n2008 0349a07

菩提 Bodhi originally no tree also is not a stand

The consensus

TranslatorRenders itSource
Yampolsky “the clear mirror also has no stand” The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch
Red Pine “a mirror with no stand” The Platform Sutra
Cleary “no stand for the mirror” The Sutra of Hui-neng
Suzuki sole outlier nowhere shining Essays in Zen Buddhism, First Series, p. 155 (and Essentials pp. 84, 173; Introduction p. 48)

The dictionary's evidence

明鏡亦非臺 occurs 98 times across 83 files. The Dunhuang variant (T48n2007, 0338a07) reads 明鏡亦無臺: still “no stand.” Every recension keeps 臺; none contains a “shining” predicate.

  1. Huineng 慧能 · T48n2008 菩提本無樹,明鏡亦非,本來無一物,何處惹塵埃 0349a07
    Tiantai commentary (quoting the verse) · G157n2601 菩提本無樹,明鏡亦非,本來無一物,何處惹塵埃 1052a07

    Bodhi originally has no tree; the bright mirror too is no stand; originally, there is not a single thing: where could dust alight? (same line · 2 recensions)

The same 臺-deletion appears in Suzuki’s rendering of Shenxiu’s verse, where 明鏡臺 “bright-mirror stand” becomes simply “a mirror bright”; see the companion case on 心 → “soul.” The exhaustive sweep adds a fourth work to the witness list: in The Zen Doctrine of No-Mind (1949) the stand is gone again, “And our mind a mirror bright” (ledger CTU-002507), the same deletion in the very book whose “cage” passage is this site’s flagship.

The literal reading

Shenxiu offered two props: a tree (樹) and a mirror-stand (臺). Huineng’s answering verse negates exactly those two, term for term: 本無樹 // 亦非臺, no tree, and also no stand. Nothing is added; two objects are denied.

The alteration

The couplet is built on a strict object-for-object parallel: Shenxiu names a tree and a mirror-stand; Huineng negates precisely those two props. Suzuki deletes the stand from both verses and, in Huineng’s, invents a predicate no recension contains: “nowhere shining.”

Two losses follow. The reader can no longer see that Huineng answers Shenxiu term for term; the retort’s architecture is gone. And a flat ontological negation, “also not a stand,” becomes a mystical-luminosity claim, “does not shine”: a different assertion, imported. Because both 樹 and 臺 survive in every recension, the shift is Suzuki’s, not a variant’s; and with the two mirror-lines carrying 86-plus-98 corpus occurrences, it is among the most checkable alterations in his whole œuvre.